Waving United States flag background and a picture of attorney Sabra Janko

Child Hearsay and Parenting Time Restrictions

Child Hearsay and Parenting Time Restrictions Children are unfortunately at greater risk for abuse and neglect when Stay At Home orders are in place, because they have more exposure to parents and relatives who might mistreat them. Courts have the authority to make decisions regarding child placement. Yet, children usually do not testify in court proceedings. How is evidence in the possession of a child admitted in the course of a court proceeding?

Child and Family Investigator or Parental Responsibilities Evaluator

One way for relevant evidence regarding children to be admitted is through a Child and Family Investigator (CFI) or Parental Responsibilities Evaluator (PRE). These court-appointed professionals conduct investigations, and because they are court-appointed neutrals not representing the interests of either party, they can write and testify as to statements made by children.

The CFI or PRE is considered an expert witness, and under Colorado Rule of Evidence 705, may testify as to opinions that lay witnesses can not. The CFI or PRE is also presumed to be an unbiased witness, which adds credibility to their testimony. The expert may be required to disclose the facts underlying their opinion on cross-examination. Experts can testify as to inadmissible facts and data, including hearsay, if that evidence formed the basis of their opinion and is a type reasonably relied on by others in the field.


There are a few other ways that evidence of a child's statements can come into evidence, despite that, without an evidentiary exception, they are considered inadmissible "hearsay" - an out of court statement offered for the truth of the matter asserted. There are five hearsay exceptions that may make a child's statement an admissible exception.

  1. Present sense impression - a statement relating to a startling event or condition made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement caused by the event or condition.
  2. Excited utterance - (1) that there was a startling occurrence or event sufficiently startling to render normal thought processes inoperative and (2) the statement of declarant was a spontaneous reaction to the occurrence or event, not the result of reflective thought.
  3. Present mental, emotional or physical condition
  4. Statements made for the purpose of medical diagnosis or treatment
Child Hearsay

Statements of a child victim about sexual or physical abuse are a hearsay exception if (1) the time, content and circumstances of the statement provide sufficient safeguards of reliability and (2) The child either testifies or is unavailable as a witness and there is corroborative evidence of the act which is the subject of the statement.

Child Testimony In Camera

A court may interview a child in chambers and permit counsel to be present at the interview. A record of the interview must be made and become part of the case record unless the Court does not ask the child about their wishes as to allocation of parental responsibilities. The Court has discretion in deciding whether to hear directly from a child or not. Because discussing a matter may be difficult and traumatic for a child, many courts consider the age of the child and the importance of the testimony in determining whether to hear directly from a child.

Therapist-Patient Privilege

How does the therapist-patient privilege impact evidence of child abuse and neglect? Sometimes therapists are in possession of relevant evidence, yet there are important protections in place to ensure the integrity of therapeutic relationships, and to encourage patients to confide in therapists without fearing that their confidences will be made public.

A patient must consent to the testimony of his or her therapist in court, but a child can not waive the privilege, because he or she is not considered competent to do so due to age. A parent also can not waive the privilege when the parent is a party to an action and may have a self-serving motive in the testimony.

If you have questions about parenting time restrictions and evidence, contact Janko Family Law Solutions for a free case assessment to determine what your legal options are and how we might assist in resolving your legal issue so that you can put it behind you. We can be contacted at 719-344-5523.

Client Reviews
Excellent service! Sabra and her team work diligently while looking for all the little details that impact the case. Im so grateful to have found this firm. Great communication from start to finish. Also they were very patient with my lack of understanding the court process. Highly recommend! Chris Faucett
As an active duty service member I can definitely say that at Janko Family Law Solutions I was served with the utmost professionalism, in a timely and efficient manner. Very glad I discovered these experienced professionals to assist me in my legal circumstances, and I will certainly be recommending them to people in the future. Rebecca Cody
Sabra and her office are wonderful to work with! ... very knowledgeable, supportive, and compassionate during the entire process. The experience and legal expertise are evident. Tim Halladay
Contact Us for a Free Consultation